Domain Publish AI LLM Workflows
Give an LLM a defined content task, a verified source record, and a predictable output structure before moving its draft into a page.
Define the content contract
A large language model can help draft domain descriptions, headings, summaries, and related-page suggestions. To make that work reviewable, define what goes in and what should come out. Begin with the exact domain, the page's purpose, the intended audience, allowed facts, and the existing destination URL. Add a clear instruction to leave unsupported information out.
Keep the input record separate from the writing instructions. The record holds facts; the instructions explain the desired style, length, and structure. This separation makes it easier to reuse a format without accidentally carrying details from one domain into another. The domain name CMS guide provides a useful starting point for the record.
Ask for fields you can inspect
A structured output might contain a title, short description, introduction, possible uses, primary link label, and review notes. Define what each field means. For example, possible uses should describe future options, while the introduction should contain only approved facts. Keep an explicit place for uncertainty instead of encouraging the model to write around missing information.
If the workflow uses JSON, define required keys and expected data types. A domain field can be a string, and a list of possible uses can be an array of strings. The JSON Schema object reference explains properties, required fields, and controls for additional properties. Those checks help identify structural problems before content reaches a template.
Separate structure checks from factual review
Passing a schema check means the output follows the defined structure. It does not establish that a description is true or that a link reaches the intended page. Compare the returned domain and destination with the source record. Review claims, spelling, tone, and whether the page gives the visitor a meaningful next step.
Reject a draft that introduces customer numbers, awards, partnerships, market values, or unavailable features. Check titles and descriptions with the same care as paragraphs. Review notes should identify a missing fact or an unresolved decision so the editor can address it directly.
Keep the template responsible for presentation
Use reviewed fields as content within a predictable layout. Keep navigation, shared footer information, asset paths, and common styling in the template. This reduces the number of unrelated design decisions in each drafting task and makes page-to-page review easier.
Connect the output to real resources. An approved link to the banner gallery can support an article about creative assets. A relevant domain ticker can support a portfolio category. Link choices still need an editor's check for context and relevance.
Maintain a reproducible handoff
Save the input brief, reviewed output, and a short note about any corrections. If a destination changes later, update the source record before generating a new draft. Use the AI domain publishing workflow for the broader review process and the website builder guide to plan how the approved content becomes a maintainable site.
Explore longer planning examples in Domain Publish Lab.